MT 來郵，說在照片中，不知誰是隆志？因我倆素未謀面。
我電郵回覆：
『看到隆志的相是虛妄的。感受到生命的存在才是真實的.
今天是釋迦牟尼佛成道的日子，願法輪常轉，普利十方！
有幸與各位相識，是緣是業都銷歸自性。
我們相約在真如法界普光明殿再會，您有膽色參與嗎？
願我們很快重聚。我們已相聚，正相聚，當相聚在普光明殿裡！
LZ』
電郵發出後，收到以下的回應：
WE ARE THERE, THAT'S QUITE ENIGMATIC!
LY
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Dear LZ,
My reply to attend ... hopefully with guest(s) ....
( I've just learned the definition of 普光明殿 from HeShang ).
NS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
LZ,
LZ...is not LZ ... So it is named.
Seeing the picture is not the picture...then you will be awared of Ru-Lai （如來）.
The picture is Delusion alright...But it is a real picture...although It is not " IT. "
We should not avoid " Fei Fei Fa （非非法） ". Since it is one of the functions of Ru-Lai Zhang（如來藏）. NO ?
The reflection in the water is evident...so it is useful. ( Although IT is not the real thing.)
Form (picture) should not disturb the REAL NATURE. So ...
..."FORM IS NATURE, NATURE IS FORM." The TWO is ONENESS. NO distinction. NO?
Happy Healthy New Year ....Fa Xi （法喜）
MT heshi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Hi LZ,
If you don't mind waiting for me, eventually I have confidence that I will be there. I think the way we go about things maybe different, and I may not even know exactly how to get there, but I know if I can stay the course, I'll be there :)
I saw a documentary recently on the biography channel - a documentary on the secret bible- the Gospel of Judas. In this it portrayed Judas as one who understood Jesus, who He is and what He stands for. Judas, therefore, sacrificed himself to help Jesus accomplished his mission on earth. Very interesting and controversial, isn't it?
It only proves what Buddhism said: everything is illusive, what one reads from words (even though this doctrine has stood over time- 2000+ yrs) can be mere inventions by others for some purpose- the gospels of Mark, Peter, Matthew and Luke? Be it the four apostles or Judas and his like, what is important is just the truth of Christianity : love, forgivenss and compassion. The rest is just the culture and invention by man.
Another thing that rang true for me in reading the Time magazine, there was an interview on David Cameron- the conservative party leader in UK who believed will become the next prime minister- he criticized the Tony Blair's policy in placing UK's relationship with US- as a friend who will say and do what US what to hear, instead of the good friend who will be candid with US.
Who is the better friend? Should there be judgement, I guess we all need these friends at different stages in life. It should be counted as blessings, that we have friends who try to support us, isn't it?
Love,
N.S.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
